A Pfizer Vaccine With A Serious Long-term Side-Effect

A Cautionary Tale

In 2004, Pfizer Animal Health began selling Pregsure BVD, a vaccine for cows to prevent bovine viral diarrhea.

A pdf report about happened in subsequent years is available here:

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwjwrsTti8P1AhWFLn0KHXloAREQFnoECAQQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fdspace.library.uu.nl%2Fbitstream%2Fhandle%2F1874%2F295634%2Fdrs.m.j.h.p.m.strik3051315-frombvdvaccinationtobleedingcalves-researchinternshipreport.pdf%3Fsequence%3D1&usg=AOvVaw15sdYb_CZg-lPT4FCYmovD

In 2006, a strange disease started killing newborn calves all across Europe. Bovine neonatal pancytopenia, or bleeding calf syndrome, was a condition that caused young calves to bleed from all their body orifices, and die.

Though the condition was relatively rare, it tended to occur in clusters, which magnified its economic impact. As many as 15% of calves born on some farms would die of the disease. It must have been heartbreaking for farmers.

After some painstaking detective work, it was eventually realized that an inordinate number of the calves that were dying had dams that had been given three or more doses of the Pregsure BVD vaccine, sometimes several years previously. The issue was complicated somewhat by the fact that bleeding calf syndrome can have more than one antecedent.

The side effect was relatively rare, occurring roughly once out of every 6,000 doses of Pregsure BVD vaccine administered, but it was serious enough in its impacts for authorities to want to pull the vaccine from the market.

By 2010, authorities in Germany had successfully pressured Pfizer to stop selling Pregsure BVD in Germany. Pfizer continued selling the vaccine in other parts of Europe. Only when it had been definitively proven that bleeding calf syndrome was a delayed side-effect of the Pregsure vaccine, did Pfizer finally stop selling it.

A 2012 Public Library of Science study found that 50 of the 55 calves with bleeding calf syndrome had dams that had received the Pregsure BVD vaccine, whereas only 14 of the 54 healthy calves in the control group had dams vaccinated with Pregsure. The odds of that lopsided an outcome occurring by chance were less than 1 in a thousand.

How could a vaccine given to female cows cause their offspring born several years later to die horribly? Researchers discovered that the Pregsure vaccine caused some cows to develop alloantibodies - basically an auto-immune response. Calves received these alloantibodies via colostrum they received from their dams. Multiple doses of vaccine acted as repeated triggers to an autoimmune reaction to the vaccine.

Who was the head of Pfizer Animal Health division at that time? Why none other than the veterinarian Albert Bourla. If that name sounds familiar to you, it's because Bourla is now the Chief Executive Officer of Pfizer.

Even though Bourla knew that Pfizer's Pregsure vaccine had had serious side effects that only showed up after the vaccine had been in use for several years, Bourla and Pfizer nonetheless successfully pressured the CDC and the FDA to monitor side effects of Pfizer's mRNA COVID vaccine for only 60 days after vaccination. (Mind you, they did demand that US Government give Pfizer legal indemnity against any damages caused by vaccine side-effects!)

Be aware that Pregsure went through a much longer and more rigorous vetting process than Pfizer's mRNA vaccine did. Even so, only after Pregsure had been in use for several years was it discovered that this vaccine had a very serious long-term side-effect.

Under normal circumstance a new vaccine like the Pfizer mRNA COVID vaccine would have had to undergo several years of testing before coming to market. Under normal circumstances the Pfizer vaccine would have been put through even more rigorous and protracted testing than most vaccines because it was not only a new vaccine, but a new and unproven vaccine technology.

Instead, the new Pfizer vaccine was allowed to skip animal trials of the vaccine. Only a very brief set of human trials was done before the vaccine was approved under an emergency use authorization.

At a time when most new vaccines would still be at the early stages of the approval process, 310 million doses of the Pfizer vaccine have been administered in the US. The Moderna vaccines were also put through a warp-speed approval process. More than 200 million doses of the Moderna vaccines have been administered in the US in just over a year. Again, under normal circumstances the Moderna mRNA vaccine would still be in the early stages of a multi-year approval process.

It is also clear that the CDC and the FDA, having bet the farm on mRNA vaccines, do not want to know if these vaccines have either short-term or long-term side-effects. The internet is absolutely littered with complaints from doctors about how reluctant the CDC is to receive reports about vaccine side-effects. If the mRNA vaccines have either short-term or long-term serious side-effects, the regulatory agencies involved clearly do not want to know about them!

Why am I telling you all this? I am extremely concerned that there are now some some media 'experts' advising people to get an mRNA booster after having recovered from Omicron.

Let's look at the big picture of why that is happening.

First of all, Omicron is a vaccine-escape variant. It is ripping through the North American population at approximately the same rate it would have done if absolutely no-one had been vaccinated. It represents an absolutely spectacular failure of the mRNA COVID vaccines, no matter how much public health authorities try to spin it otherwise.

Rather than admitting failure, public health authorities have tried very hard to distract the public by blaming the unvaccinated, and/or pretending that repeated booster doses will somehow solve the problem.

Some public health 'experts' are even pretending that vaccine-based immunity is somehow superior to natural immunity, and that even those who have recovered from Omicron should get booster-vaccinated. This is not just nonsense, it is nonsense that could be dangerous to your health.

If you've been infected with Omicron and recovered, you now have the best immunity to COVID of anyone on the planet. Whereas vaccines only create an immune response to the highly-changeable spike protein, natural immunity creates immune protection to the entire Omicron genome, including those parts of the Coronavirus genome that are most stable and most likely to be part of any future variants of COVID.

If you've been infected with Omicron, you have an immunity to the most recent variant of COVID. Vaccines are now two years out of date in the protection they offer.

Finally, if you've survived Omicron, you will have a strong immune response where you most need it: in your nose, throat and lungs. Vaccine-based immunity occurs primarily in the blood, which is less useful in slowing the spread of a respiratory virus.

If you have recovered from Omicron, there's absolutely no reason for you to take on whatever unknown short-term or long-term risks are associated with getting an mRNA booster shot.

I would specifically suggest to any woman who imagines she might have children one day, that there's also a precedent here for a Pfizer vaccine having had a delayed impact on the ability to bear healthy offspring. Even if it's a miniscule risk associated with a booster shot, if you've recovered from Omicron, why take a risk that offers no benefit?